🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, states are investing enormous sums into what is known as “sovereign AI” – creating national AI technologies. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, states are racing to build AI that comprehends local languages and local customs.

The International AI Arms Race

This movement is part of a broader international race led by tech giants from the America and China. While firms like OpenAI and Meta allocate enormous funds, mid-sized nations are also taking independent investments in the artificial intelligence domain.

However given such tremendous amounts in play, is it possible for developing nations secure meaningful advantages? According to a specialist from a prominent research institute, “Unless you’re a wealthy government or a major corporation, it’s a significant burden to create an LLM from the ground up.”

National Security Issues

A lot of countries are hesitant to rely on foreign AI models. In India, for example, US-built AI solutions have at times fallen short. A particular instance featured an AI tool employed to educate students in a distant area – it interacted in English with a pronounced Western inflection that was difficult to follow for regional listeners.

Furthermore there’s the national security aspect. In the Indian security agencies, using certain external systems is seen as inadmissible. As one entrepreneur noted, There might be some random data source that could claim that, such as, Ladakh is separate from India … Using that certain model in a military context is a big no-no.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with individuals who are in defence. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they prefer not to rely on US platforms because data could travel overseas, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Projects

Consequently, several nations are supporting domestic projects. An example such effort is underway in the Indian market, wherein a firm is attempting to create a domestic LLM with state support. This initiative has allocated roughly a substantial sum to machine learning progress.

The developer envisions a system that is less resource-intensive than top-tier systems from American and Asian tech companies. He explains that the country will have to compensate for the financial disparity with skill. “Being in India, we lack the luxury of pouring massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete with for example the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the brain game plays a role.”

Local Priority

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is supporting machine learning tools trained in local local dialects. These particular languages – such as the Malay language, Thai, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and more – are frequently underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the experts who are building these independent AI models were aware of the extent to which and just how fast the cutting edge is moving.

A leader participating in the initiative notes that these models are designed to supplement larger AI, instead of replacing them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he says, frequently have difficulty with native tongues and culture – interacting in awkward the Khmer language, for instance, or suggesting meat-containing meals to Malay individuals.

Creating regional-language LLMs allows state agencies to incorporate local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a sophisticated technology created in other countries.

He continues, I am cautious with the term national. I think what we’re attempting to express is we want to be more adequately included and we want to understand the features” of AI platforms.

Cross-Border Collaboration

Regarding states attempting to find their place in an intensifying international arena, there’s a different approach: team up. Researchers associated with a respected university put forward a public AI company allocated across a alliance of developing countries.

They term the project “a collaborative AI effort”, in reference to the European effective initiative to create a alternative to Boeing in the mid-20th century. The plan would entail the formation of a public AI company that would combine the capabilities of several countries’ AI initiatives – for example the UK, Spain, the Canadian government, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to develop a competitive rival to the US and Chinese major players.

The primary researcher of a paper outlining the initiative notes that the idea has attracted the consideration of AI ministers of at least three countries to date, in addition to multiple national AI organizations. While it is currently targeting “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have additionally shown curiosity.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the assurances of this current US administration. Individuals are wondering for example, can I still depend on these technologies? In case they choose to