🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in additional member states