🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of the publication Authentic, writer the author raises a critical point: everyday directives to “be yourself” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not harmless encouragements for self-expression – they often become snares. Her first book – a mix of recollections, research, cultural commentary and discussions – aims to reveal how businesses co-opt identity, transferring the responsibility of corporate reform on to individual workers who are frequently at risk.

Personal Journey and Wider Environment

The driving force for the publication stems partly in the author’s professional path: multiple jobs across business retail, startups and in global development, filtered through her perspective as a Black disabled woman. The two-fold position that Burey experiences – a back-and-forth between standing up for oneself and aiming for security – is the driving force of the book.

It arrives at a time of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across the US and beyond, as backlash to diversity and inclusion efforts mount, and various institutions are scaling back the very frameworks that earlier assured change and reform. Burey delves into that landscape to contend that retreating from authenticity rhetoric – that is, the corporate language that trivializes identity as a collection of surface traits, quirks and hobbies, leaving workers preoccupied with managing how they are perceived rather than how they are handled – is not a solution; rather, we should redefine it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Performance of Self

Through vivid anecdotes and conversations, Burey shows how underrepresented staff – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, women workers, people with disabilities – soon understand to calibrate which self will “pass”. A sensitive point becomes a drawback and people try too hard by attempting to look palatable. The act of “bringing your full self” becomes a display surface on which various types of expectations are projected: emotional work, sharing personal information and continuous act of thankfulness. As the author states, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but absent the safeguards or the trust to withstand what comes out.

As Burey explains, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but absent the protections or the confidence to withstand what arises.’

Case Study: Jason’s Experience

The author shows this phenomenon through the narrative of an employee, a deaf employee who chose to educate his team members about deaf community norms and communication practices. His willingness to talk about his life – a gesture of candor the office often applauds as “authenticity” – for a short time made routine exchanges smoother. Yet, the author reveals, that improvement was precarious. Once employee changes erased the unofficial understanding Jason had built, the atmosphere of inclusion disappeared. “All of that knowledge went away with the staff,” he states tiredly. What stayed was the fatigue of needing to begin again, of being held accountable for an institution’s learning curve. According to Burey, this is what it means to be requested to share personally without protection: to endanger oneself in a structure that applauds your transparency but fails to institutionalize it into regulation. Genuineness becomes a snare when organizations depend on personal sharing rather than organizational responsibility.

Literary Method and Notion of Opposition

Burey’s writing is both clear and poetic. She combines intellectual rigor with a manner of kinship: an invitation for audience to engage, to interrogate, to disagree. According to the author, dissent at work is not loud rebellion but principled refusal – the practice of opposing uniformity in workplaces that demand appreciation for basic acceptance. To oppose, in her framing, is to interrogate the stories institutions describe about justice and belonging, and to decline engagement in customs that maintain unfairness. It might look like identifying prejudice in a discussion, withdrawing of uncompensated “inclusion” effort, or setting boundaries around how much of oneself is offered to the institution. Resistance, she suggests, is an assertion of self-respect in settings that typically reward compliance. It is a practice of integrity rather than rebellion, a way of insisting that an individual’s worth is not conditional on institutional approval.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses rigid dichotomies. Authentic does not simply eliminate “authenticity” completely: rather, she calls for its reclamation. According to the author, authenticity is not simply the unfiltered performance of personality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more deliberate alignment between individual principles and personal behaviors – an integrity that opposes alteration by organizational requirements. Rather than treating genuineness as a requirement to disclose excessively or adjust to sterilized models of transparency, the author encourages followers to maintain the aspects of it rooted in sincerity, self-awareness and moral understanding. According to Burey, the objective is not to abandon sincerity but to relocate it – to move it out of the boardroom’s performative rituals and toward connections and workplaces where confidence, justice and answerability make {